<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Glassdoor Blog - Latest Comments in First &amp;#8220;Review of the Month&amp;#8221; winner</title><link>http://glassdoor.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://glassdoor.disqus.com/first_8220review_of_the_month8221_winner/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:54:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: First &amp;#8220;Review of the Month&amp;#8221; winner</title><link>http://www.glassdoor.com/blog/first-review-of-the-month-winner/#comment-12658782</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought that the post on NetFlix indicated that they had a weak management structure, small number of people, and lots of money.  In this model, the management is really a coach, non-performance is easily measured, there is a wealth of possible employees to fill any slot, and institutional memory isn't important. They are probably limiting themselves to under 100 people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gary</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>