<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Glassdoor Blog - Latest Comments in AT&amp;#038;T’s “There’s a Map for That” Lawsuit Against Verizon</title><link>http://glassdoor.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://glassdoor.disqus.com/at038ts_theres_a_map_for_that_lawsuit_against_verizon/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:58:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AT&amp;#038;T’s “There’s a Map for That” Lawsuit Against Verizon</title><link>http://www.glassdoor.com/blog/atts-map-lawsuit-verizon/#comment-23087511</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We all know that AT&amp;amp;T service is now on a plummet but we also need to settle the facts first and see the side of AT&amp;amp;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Updates: ATT had recently released a statement why they are suing Verizon. May the "there's a misinterpretaion for that that” image help you to understand better why AT&amp;amp;T is having a boiling-point over the matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;detailed sources: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/ATT-VS-VERIZON-Theres-a-misinterpretation-for-that" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/ATT-VS-VERIZON-Theres-a-misinterpretation-for-that"&gt;http://bit.ly/ATT-VS-VERIZO...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hint: The conflict is about not including AT&amp;amp;T’s Zedge 2.5G on the picture :D&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Flame-on!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">magnumfinger</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:58:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>