<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Glassdoor Blog - Latest Comments in Apple, a Fortress of Secrecy?</title><link>http://glassdoor.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://glassdoor.disqus.com/apple_a_fortress_of_secrecy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:38:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apple, a Fortress of Secrecy?</title><link>http://localhost/blog/production/apple-a-fortress-of-secrecy/#comment-24622938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for giving this information&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">itjob123</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:38:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple, a Fortress of Secrecy?</title><link>http://localhost/blog/production/apple-a-fortress-of-secrecy/#comment-12660576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft fortress of thievery.&lt;br&gt;Apple has learned it lessons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JS</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:30:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple, a Fortress of Secrecy?</title><link>http://localhost/blog/production/apple-a-fortress-of-secrecy/#comment-12660575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When used correctly both Secrecy and NDA's can be very good things if used in the right way. However it does seem that Apple was a bit broad on it's use of NDA's for developers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MacGecko</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>